June 4, 2008
Regarding your May 7, 2008, Commentary “If We’re Talking About Race, Let’s Talk About Education”:
Peter J. McWalters, Rhode Island’s education commissioner who is stepping down next year, should be commended for adhering to his principles, but condemned for his cockeyed optimism ("Outgoing R.I. Chief Bucked National Push for High-Stakes Tests,” May 7, 2008).
There is truly very little that is new under the education sun, or so many veteran teachers such as I will be more than happy to tell you. Your article on the value to children of playing board games, as a way of developing their math skills, is a case in point ("Playing Games in Classroom Helping Pupils Grasp Math," April 30, 2008.)
It is no surprise that single-sex classes have emerged as a school reform that may foster student achievement (“Single-Sex Schooling Gets New Showcase,” In Perspective, May 7, 2008). But single-sex classes are not a silver bullet that will solve all problems associated with student learning.
Congratulations to Randi Weingarten for her excellent Commentary "Accountability That Works," which relates the United Federation of Teachers’ proposed four pillars of a new school evaluation system (May 14, 2008). As a 77-year-old semiretired public school veteran, I am delighted that Ms. Weingarten describes so eloquently what all school districts should put in place. There is, however, a fifth pillar, similar to the fourth, central-administration accountability, but distinct: accountability for school boards, mayors, and other officials who appropriate funds for public schools. They must be held to account for the quality of education throughout their respective districts. Our children deserve no less.
Only those who have made a career of teaching can fully appreciate James D. Starkey’s perceptive remarks in his Commentary “Please Don’t Do Me Any Favors” (May 14, 2008). He speaks the absolute truth about the status of public school teachers in American society.
The two May 7, 2008, letters to the editor responding to your April 16, 2008, article “Papal Visit Spurs Plea for ‘Saving’ Catholic Schools” missed the point of both the University of Notre Dame’s task force report on Catholic schools and the recent Thomas B. Fordham Institute report “Who Will Save America’s Urban Catholic Schools?” No doubt stinging from the April visit of Pope Benedict XVI and his full embrace of Catholic education, followed a week later by a White House summit convened by President Bush on inner-city faith-based private schools, public school lobbyists are quick to resort to the standard—and now expected—defense of the teachers’ unions.