February 25, 2009
In his Commentary "Rethinking the Notion of Public vs. Private" (Jan. 21, 2009), Doug Tuthill rolls the dough of his horseradish privatization muffin in the sweet oatmeal of President Barack Obama’s political campaign, hoping that no one will notice what he is selling.
I agree with Richard Rothstein on the importance of reforming accountability, but not only for the classroom ("Getting Accountability Right," Commentary, Jan. 28, 2009). My life’s work has been trying to get educational accountability right for the family and community. President Barack Obama refers often to parental responsibilities—that’s true accountability.
In your Jan. 28, 2009, article "School Leaders Target Salary Reform Toward Newer Teachers," the National Education Association is identified as favoring shorter salary schedules as a method for improving compensation for new teachers and teachers overall. This certainly is a valid proposal. Most salary schedules are a tall mountain to climb from entry-level to maximum pay. Many teachers can’t wait out a stretched-out schedule, and leave the profession far too early.
Marion Brady asks a dangerous question in his Commentary "No Dog Left Behind" (Jan. 28, 2009): "Why are one-size-fits-all performance standards inappropriate to the point of silliness when applied to dogs, but accepted without question when applied to kids?" I’m fine with advising Chihuahuas not to be guard dogs, but which students should we decide aren’t going to be able to read, write, or do math? And how young should we tell them?