School & District Management

Panel Sets Federal Priorities for Research

By Debra Viadero — September 13, 2005 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A national advisory board signed off last week on broad guidelines to help the Department of Education decide what kinds of new studies and other research projects it should commission.

The new priorities will apply specifically to the Institute of Education Sciences, which is the department’s primary research arm. The institute is overseeing an estimated $575 million in projects, but only some of those efforts are funded at the discretion of institute staff members.

“This provides a public statement for staff inside the agency and for those outside the agency on the work that IES is going to focus on as a research agency,” said Robert C. Granger, the chairman of the 14-member National Board of Education Sciences and the president of the William T. Grant Foundation, of New York City.

Approving the priorities was one of the first tasks for the presidentially appointed board, which was created in 2002 to provide independent advice to the research agency.

The wish list the board approved was slightly expanded from an earlier draft that the institute put out for public comment in June. (“Learning by At-Risk Students Tops List of Proposed Research Priorities,” July 13, 2005)

Overall, the priorities set four long-term goals for the research agency:

• Studying education interventions that promote students’ academic learning and that can be widely deployed;

• Finding out what programs or policies do not work in education and which might not be cost-effective;

• Funding more basic research on the reasons that education programs, policies, and practices work in some places but not others; and

• Developing systems for delivering research on which policymakers, educators, and the public will come to rely.

“The institute has to demonstrate its usefulness by showing and producing things that school districts can use, and that’s exactly what you’ve got here,” said Jon Baron, a panel member. Mr. Baron is the executive director of the Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy, a nonpartisan Washington group.

In response to letters from advocates and national research groups, the final priorities were amended to include studies that more directly address the needs of students with disabilities, research that explores why program effects vary from place to place, and studies on parents’ roles in their children’s learning.

The draft of the priorities elicited 36 comments, and department officials said they considered most of them in making their revisions.

For example, some of the comments came from national groups who said the draft priorities focused too narrowly on studying learning in reading, writing, mathematics, and science when research was needed in other disciplines, such as civics and history, too.

‘A Set of Choices’

In response, Grover J. “Russ” Whitehurst, the institute’s director, said the language was changed to encourage research on reading and writing within a wider range of disciplines.

But the document’s overall focus on what it defines as the four core academic subjects remained intact.

“In no sense are our research priorities an indication that we think other topics are unimportant,” Mr. Whitehurst said. “But these are priorities, and priorities represent a set of choices.”

National research groups, such as the American Educational Research Association and the National Education Knowledge Industry Association, which are both based in Washington, generally praised the document for what they see as its clarity.

Mr. Whitehurst said he would use the guidelines to devise a research action plan for the board to consider at its next meeting, in January.

A version of this article appeared in the September 14, 2005 edition of Education Week as Panel Sets Federal Priorities for Research

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Harnessing AI to Address Chronic Absenteeism in Schools
Learn how AI can help your district improve student attendance and boost academic outcomes.
Content provided by Panorama Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Science Webinar
Spark Minds, Reignite Students & Teachers: STEM’s Role in Supporting Presence and Engagement
Is your district struggling with chronic absenteeism? Discover how STEM can reignite students' and teachers' passion for learning.
Content provided by Project Lead The Way
Recruitment & Retention Webinar EdRecruiter 2025 Survey Results: The Outlook for Recruitment and Retention
See exclusive findings from EdWeek’s nationwide survey of K-12 job seekers and district HR professionals on recruitment, retention, and job satisfaction. 

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School & District Management 3 Big Challenges School Lunch Programs Face as They Feed Students
School nutrition directors report problems with costs, supply shortages, and staffing.
4 min read
Students wrap up their lunch break at Lowell Elementary School in Albuquerque, New Mexico, on Aug. 22, 2023.
Students wrap up their lunch break at Lowell Elementary School in Albuquerque, N.M., on Aug. 22, 2023. Rising costs and staff shortages are squeezing school nutrition programs.
Susan Montoya Bryan/AP
School & District Management Superintendents Say Public Schools Can Compete With School Choice. Here's How
The four finalists for the National Superintendent said schools have to get creative to attract students.
4 min read
011425 SOY Finalists BS
The four finalists for the 2025 National Superintendent of the Year speak at a Jan. 9 panel discussion at the National Press Club in Washington. From left to right: Debbie Jones, Walter B. Gonsoulin Jr., Sharon Desmoulin-Kherat, and David K. Moore
Courtesy of AASA
School & District Management Classroom Interruptions Add Up Quickly to Lost Learning Time
During a typical school year, teachers contend with potentially thousands of interruptions to classroom time.
3 min read
Image of a clock on supplies.
Laura Baker/Education Week via Canva<br/>
School & District Management Are Snow Days Making a Comeback?
While some school districts use remote learning days when wintry weather strikes, others are reverting to—or sticking with—snow days.
4 min read
Rosie Henson, from left, Charlotte Hall and Jaya Demni play around in the snow near Schifferstadt Museum in Frederick, Md.,on Monday, Jan. 6. 2025.
Rosie Henson, from left, Charlotte Hall and Jaya Demni play around in the snow near Schifferstadt Museum in Frederick, Md.,on Jan. 6. 2025.
Ric Dugan/The Frederick News-Post via AP