Federal

5 Key Takeaways From Linda McMahon’s Confirmation Hearing

The business mogul said schools shouldn’t expect funding cuts even as she works on winding down the U.S. Department of Education
By Brooke Schultz — February 13, 2025 6 min read
Linda McMahon, President Donald Trump’s nominee to be Secretary of Education, arrives for her Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee confirmation hearing, at the U.S. Capitol, in Washington, on Feb. 13, 2025.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Linda McMahon made her case to lead the U.S. Department of Education on Thursday amid upheaval that has left staffing diminished, funding in question, and the agency’s very future up for grabs.

For more than two hours, the former business mogul who served in President Donald Trump’s first administration by overseeing the Small Business Administration had to answer for the already charged environment she’d be stepping into if confirmed by the Senate.

McMahon has faced pushback from the nation’s largest teachers’ unions, and protestors disrupted her hearing. Democratic senators who questioned McMahon were concerned with the changes already underway at the department, but Republicans advocated for a change to what they see as an ineffectual status quo.

See Also

Linda McMahon, President Donald Trump’s nominee to be Secretary of Education, testifies during her Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee confirmation hearing, at the U.S. Capitol, in Washington, on Feb. 13, 2025.
Linda McMahon, President Donald Trump’s nominee to be Secretary of Education, testifies during her confirmation hearing before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee at the U.S. Capitol in Washington on Feb. 13, 2025.
Graeme Sloan for Education Week

“If confirmed as secretary, I will work with Congress to reorient the department toward helping educators, not controlling them,” she told lawmakers in her opening remarks. “Outstanding teachers are tired of political ideology in their curriculum and red tape on their desks.”

Here are five key takeaways from the hearing.

McMahon promised to distribute money Congress has approved

Trump’s funding freeze, initiated in his second week in office to align federal spending with a barrage of executive orders he issued in the first days of his second term, sent a flurry of panic through schools last month due to the lack of clarity over which funds were subject to it.

Litigation ultimately halted the order, and Congress chafed at the president overstepping his executive authority.

McMahon said during the hearing that she would distribute money appropriated by Congress, even as Trump and others in his administration have asserted that a 1974 law limiting the president’s authority to withhold money Congress has appropriated is unconstitutional.

But she also defended cost-cutting by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency team—which has included the cancellation of nearly $900 million in Education Department contracts—saying that it was “worthwhile to take a look at the programs before money goes out the door.”

“It’s much easier—it is much easier to stop the money as it’s going out the door than it is to claw it back,” she told lawmakers.

McMahon wants to expand Pell grants to career certifications

With growing concerns about diminishing the Education Department and slashing its bottom line—something Trump did endeavor to do in his first term—lawmakers pressed McMahon to ensure Pell grants, a federal subsidy that helps students in low-income families pay for college, would not be eliminated, even if the department is.

McMahon said she did not want to defund the department and its functions, but believed its operations could be better executed in other agencies. She said she saw possibilities to expand Pell grants.

“I’d like to see short-term certificates of Pell grants for students who aren’t going on to four-year universities, who could have the opportunity to use Pell grants for skill-based learning,” she said.

Linda McMahon, President Donald Trump’s nominee to be Secretary of Education, testifies during her Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee confirmation hearing, at the U.S. Capitol, in Washington, on Feb. 13, 2025.

Workforce Pell grants, she said, could “stimulate our economy, provide opportunity for those who want to participate in skill-based learning,” and get students into the workforce faster.

McMahon declined to say if Black history courses violated Trump’s executive order on ‘radical indoctrination’

Trump has already delved into leaving a mark on the nation’s public schools, with one particularly far-reaching executive order that threatens to pull federal dollars if schools engage in what he considers “radical indoctrination,” particularly when it comes to classroom discussions on gender identity and racism.

The federal government has no say over what schools teach. But Trump’s effort skirts the line of attempting to influence them.

Sen. Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut, pressed McMahon to define what the order could halt: a club for Vietnamese American students or Black students? African American history classes? Black history programs? Martin Luther King Jr. Day celebrations?

McMahon declined to interpret it, saying she wants to “take a look at these programs and totally understand the breadth of the executive order” before she makes definitive statements about which programs are and aren’t appropriate.

“That’s pretty chilling,” Murphy replied. “I think schools all around the country are gonna hear that.”

See Also

Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) and Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) greet Linda McMahon, President Donald Trump’s nominee to be Secretary of Education, before her Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee confirmation hearing, at the U.S. Capitol, in Washington, on Feb. 13, 2025.
Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., and Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, greet Linda McMahon, President Donald Trump’s nominee to be secretary of education, before her confirmation hearing before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee at the U.S. Capitol in Washington on Feb. 13, 2025.
Graeme Sloan for Education Week

Some of McMahon’s suggestions for rehoming Ed. Dept. programs align with Project 2025

Despite Trump’s efforts during last year’s campaign to distance himself from the 900-page conservative public policy agenda, Project 2025, the president has welcomed a number of its authors into his administration, and has already begun to implement some of the very proposals it lays out.

During McMahon’s hearing, Project 2025’s influence was on the periphery of some of her responses.

Though McMahon stopped short of specifically identifying where certain programs would go if the Education Department ceased to exist, she floated two possibilities: moving responsibility for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and moving the Education Department’s office for civil rights to the U.S. Department of Justice.

“I think if I am confirmed to be able to get in and assess programs—how they can have the best oversight possible, how we can really take the bureaucracy out of education and focus on teaching our children to read and to do math and to appreciate our history is certainly my goal, and would be my goal as the secretary of education,” she told lawmakers.

It prompted concern from Democrats that the needs of children would be lost in other departments that are much larger than the Department of Education, the smallest Cabinet-level agency in terms of staffing.

“So I just want to be clear, you’re going to put special education in the hands of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.,” Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., said in response to McMahon’s suggestion that oversight of IDEA could shift to Health and Human Services, which will be led by the newly confirmed Kennedy.

“There is a reason that the Department of Education and IDEA exists, and it is because educating kids with disabilities can be really hard, and it takes the national commitment to get it done,” Hassan said. “And that’s why so many people are so concerned about this proposal to eliminate the department, because they think kids will, once again, be shoved aside, and especially kids with disabilities.”

McMahon backed school choice, but dodged a question on strings for a federal voucher program

McMahon’s adamant support for school choice began with her opening statement to lawmakers. Teachers, she told them, are “tired of political ideology in their curriculum and red tape on their desks.”

“That’s why school choice is a growing movement across the nation,” she continued. “It offers teachers and parents an alternative to classrooms that are micromanaged from Washington, D.C., to also emphasize career-focused education, especially in cutting-edge STEM fields.”

Trump has already sought to use his executive power to propel private school choice, signing an executive order that directs the secretary of education to investigate how federal subsidies could be used for such programs, and to prioritize choice programs in competitive grant funding.

See Also

President Donald Trump signs a document in the Oval Office at the White House, Thursday, Jan. 30, 2025, in Washington.
President Donald Trump signs a document in the Oval Office at the White House, Thursday, Jan. 30, 2025, in Washington.
Evan Vucci/AP

Though choice is broadly supported by Republicans, Democrats fear it’ll take money from public schools. McMahon denied that the president, and the Education Department, would seek to diminish public school funding. She said competition would ultimately improve public schools.

She sidestepped a question from Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester, D-Del., about whether private schools should have to adhere to certain laws if they receive federal funds through vouchers.

“If private schools take federal dollars, can they turn away a child based on a disability or religion?” Blunt Rochester asked her.

“Well, I think that there are also some public schools who are saying that they don’t have…” McMahon said, before Blunt Rochester interjected that it was a “yes or no” answer.

“It’s not for me,” McMahon said.

Events

School & District Management Webinar Fostering Productive Relationships Between Principals and Teachers
Strong principal-teacher relationships = happier teachers & thriving schools. Join our webinar for practical strategies.
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
Promoting Integrity and AI Readiness in High Schools
Learn how to update school academic integrity guidelines and prepare students for the age of AI.
Content provided by Turnitin

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Ed. Dept. Says SEL Can 'Veil' Discrimination. What Does This Mean for Schools?
A document from the Education Department flags social-emotional learning—a once bipartisan education strategy—as a means of discrimination.
Deeper learning prepares students to work collaboratively and direct their own learning.
There has been an uptick in political pushback against social-emotional learning, with the Education Department recently saying some schools "have sought to veil discriminatory policies" with terms like SEL.
Allison Shelley for All4Ed
Federal Civil Rights, Research, and More: What’s Hit Hardest by Massive Ed. Dept. Cuts
An analysis of the Trump administration's cuts to the agency shows its civil rights enforcement and research arms are hit particularly hard.
Chloe Kienzle of Arlington, Va., holds a sign as she stands outside the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Eduction, which were ordered closed for the day for what officials described as security reasons amid large-scale layoffs, Wednesday, March 12, 2025, in Washington.
Chloe Kienzle of Arlington, Va., holds a sign as she stands outside the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Education on Wednesday, March 12, 2025, in Washington. The department this week said it was cutting nearly half its staff.
Mark Schiefelbein/AP
Federal Opinion The Threat to Federal School Data Is a Threat to Us All
The erosion of this fundamental information will create immediate blind spots for districts and states.
Ronald L. Wasserstein
6 min read
A bar graph melts into a puddle.
iStock/Getty Images
Federal Ed. Dept. Will Shed Nearly Half Its Staff in Massive Reduction Under Trump
The U.S. Department of Education announced Tuesday it was getting rid of nearly half its staff through a variety of measures.
6 min read
The exterior of the Department of Education Building in Washington, DC on Thursday, December 14, 2017.
The exterior of the Department of Education building in Washington on Thursday, December 14, 2017. The department's Washington office and regional offices will be closed on Wednesday for "security reasons," according to an email sent to staff members.
Swikar Patel/Education Week