Federal

Foreseeing Errors in Test Industry

By David J. Hoff — February 28, 2006 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Connecticut’s top education official predicted two years ago that the testing industry would struggle to meet the demands brought on by new federal mandates for test-based accountability. Last month, her prediction came to pass—in her own state, no less.

Harcourt Assessment Inc., which administers Connecticut’s criterion-referenced tests, told state officials that it had reported incorrect scores for 355 Connecticut high school students. While the revised scores won’t change any school’s status under federal No Child Left Behind Act rules, they will force local officials to re-evaluate whether those students will be eligible to graduate, state officials said.

“This situation is inexcusable,” Betty J. Sternberg, the state education commissioner, said in a Feb. 17 statement.

Because of the errors, the state will withhold $80,000 of the $2.8 million it pays Harcourt to administer the Connecticut Academic Performance Test, said Henry Garcia, a spokesman for the state education agency.

He acknowledged that the errors on the scores of 355 of the 44,000 students who took the test constituted a small percentage, but said that “we want our scores to be accurate.”

Ms. Sternberg predicted in 2004 that mistakes by testing companies would escalate after a different company provided inaccurate test-score data to the the state. (“Connecticut Tests Delayed By Scoring Glitches,” Feb. 11, 2004.)

At the time, Ms. Sternberg warned that the problem would only get worse once the 4-year-old No Child Left Behind Act was fully implemented this school year. That law requires states to assess student achievement in grades 3-8, and once in high school, in reading and mathematics.

Now that the law’s testing requirements are in place, reports of testing companies’ errors are bound to be commonplace, Ms. Sternberg warned last week. “I continue to question whether testing every student every year in every state in seven grades is simply too overwhelming,” she said in a statement. Connecticut is suing the U.S. Department of Education, saying the NCLB law is an unfunded mandate.

For its part, Harcourt has created a new set of audits to verify all results before they are released, said Richard Blake, a spokesman for the San Antonio-based division of Reed Elsevier Group PLC, an Anglo-Dutch publishing company.

A version of this article appeared in the March 01, 2006 edition of Education Week

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Webinar
Reflections on Evidence-Based Grading Practices: What We Learned for Next Year
Get real insights on evidence-based grading from K-12 leaders.
Content provided by Otus
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Trust in Science of Reading to Improve Intervention Outcomes
There’s no time to waste when it comes to literacy. Getting intervention right is critical. Learn best practices, tangible examples, and tools proven to improve reading outcomes.
Content provided by 95 Percent Group LLC
Mathematics Webinar How to Build Students’ Confidence in Math
Learn practical tips to build confident mathematicians in our webinar.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Letter to the Editor Public Education Benefits the American Worker and the American Economy
Our nation’s schools are central to our nation’s health and future, says this letter to the editor.
1 min read
Education Week opinion letters submissions
Gwen Keraval for Education Week
Federal Opinion Federal Education Research Has Been 'Shredded.' What's Driving This?
How to understand why the Trump administration's axe fell so heavily on the Institute of Education Sciences.
8 min read
The United States Capitol building as a bookcase filled with red, white, and blue policy books in a Washington DC landscape.
Luca D'Urbino for Education Week
Federal Opinion Here’s What the K-12 Field Thinks of the Trump Ed. Department
Educators discuss what the current administration’s changes to the U.S. Department of Education will mean for schools.
9 min read
US flag. Vector illustration with glitch effect
iStock/Getty Images
Federal Defending Ed. Dept. Cuts, Linda McMahon Says It's Time to 'Do Something Different'
Linda McMahon told ed-tech entrepreneurs she wants to cut bureaucracy but keep key federal funds flowing to schools.
8 min read
Secretary of Education Linda McMahon speaks at the ASU + GSV Summit at the Grand Hyatt in downtown San Diego, Calif., on April 8, 2025.
Secretary of Education Linda McMahon speaks at the ASU+GSV Summit at the Grand Hyatt in downtown San Diego on April 8, 2025. She defended recent cuts to the federal Education Department and said she hoped an expansion of school choice would be part of her legacy.
Ariana Drehsler for Education Week