Law & Courts

High Court Turns Down Religious-Music Case

By Mark Walsh — March 30, 2010 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The U.S. Supreme Court last week refused to take up a case involving religious music at a public school graduation ceremony, but a dissenting justice warned that a lower court’s ruling will restrict student speech rights.

Also, the justices ruled in favor of a student debtor in a case involving student loans and bankruptcy that was being watched closely by many in banking and higher education.

In the religious-music case, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. dissented from the court’s refusal to hear the appeal of Kathryn Nurre, who along with other members of a student wind ensemble sought to perform an instrumental version of “Ave Maria” at the 2006 graduation ceremony of Henry M. Jackson High School in Everett, Wash. The version was a lesser-known one composed by Franz Biebl that had been performed at other school events by the wind ensemble.

School administrators told Ms. Nurre and the wind ensemble to select a secular piece of music, which they reluctantly did. Ms. Nurre sued the superintendent of the 18,500-student Everett school district, alleging that the decision had censored her speech in violation of the First Amendment’s free-speech clause.

In a decision last September, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, in San Francisco, held that because a graduation ceremony is an obligatory event for the high school seniors, district officials acted reasonably in keeping the musical selections secular. But the panel said it was not ruling that religious music could never be played in public schools.

Alito in Dissent

Ms. Nurre pursued her case to the Supreme Court, but the justices on March 22 refused to take up the appeal in Nurre v. Whitehead (Case No. 09-671).

In his dissent from the decision not to hear the case, Justice Alito said the 9th Circuit’s ruling “is not easy to square with our free-speech jurisprudence.”

“When a public school purports to allow students to express themselves, it must respect the students’ free-speech rights,” he said. “School administrators may not behave like puppet masters who create the illusion that students are engaging in personal expression when in fact the school administration is pulling the strings.”

Justice Alito said that despite a characterization by the 9th Circuit that the district had acted on viewpoint-neutral grounds, the district prohibited “Ave Maria”—which translates to “Hail Mary”—“precisely because of its perceived religious message.”

The lower-court ruling will have important implications, he said, for the nearly 10 million public school students in the 9th Circuit, which, in addition to Washington state, covers Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, and Oregon.

“The 9th Circuit’s decision may provide the basis for wide-ranging censorship of student speech that expresses controversial ideas,” Justice Alito said.

Ms. Nurre’s appeal was brought to the high court by the Rutherford Institute, a Charlottesville, Va.-based legal-advocacy organization that often fights for student religious expression.

Student-Loan Repayment

In the bankruptcy case, the justices ruled in favor of a student who had discharged his college-loan interest in bankruptcy without having to prove he faced “undue hardship,” as federal bankruptcy law requires.

See Also

Follow The School Law Blog for news and analysis on legal developments affecting schools, educators, and parents.

In an opinion for a unanimous court, Justice Clarence Thomas said that the bankruptcy judge had committed “legal error” in approving the discharge plan for an Arizona airline employee with some $17,000 in student-loan principal and interest, but that the man’s lender had had notice of the plan and had failed to object to it in a timely manner.

The lender had waited several years to try to undo the plan.

The opinion in United Student Aid Funds Inc. v. Espinosa (No. 08-1134) did stress to bankruptcy judges that there should be “an independent determination of undue hardship” before they discharge a debtor’s student loans, even if the normal procedure outlined in bankruptcy law isn’t followed.

A version of this article appeared in the March 31, 2010 edition of Education Week as ‘Ave Maria’ Case Denied Hearing

Events

Curriculum Webinar Selecting Evidence-Based Programs for Schools and Districts: Mistakes to Avoid
Which programs really work? Confused by education research? Join our webinar to learn how to spot evidence-based programs and make data-driven decisions for your students.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Personalized Learning Webinar
Personalized Learning in the STEM Classroom
Unlock the power of personalized learning in STEM! Join our webinar to learn how to create engaging, student-centered classrooms.
Content provided by Project Lead The Way
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Webinar
Students Speak, Schools Thrive: The Impact of Student Voice Data on Achievement
Research shows that when students feel heard, their outcomes improve. Join us to learn how to capture student voice data & create positive change in your district.
Content provided by Panorama Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Iowa's Book Ban Is Reinstated by Appeals Court But Case Against It Will Continue
The Iowa law bars books depicting sex in school libraries and discussions of sexual orientation and gender identity in preK-6.
4 min read
An LGBTQ+ related book is seen on shelf at Fabulosa Books a store in the Castro District of San Francisco on Thursday, June 27, 2024. "Books Not Bans" is a program initiated and sponsored by the store that sends boxes of LGBTQ+ books to LGBTQ+ organizations in conservative parts of America, places where politicians are demonizing and banning books with LGBTQ+ affirming content.
An LGBTQ+ book section is seen at Fabulosa Books, a store in San Francisco, on June 27, 2024. A federal appeals court has reinstated an Iowa law that prohibits books depicting sex from public school libraries. Challengers claim the law has led school districts to remove scores of books out of fear of violating the law.
Haven Daley/AP
Law & Courts Louisiana Uses History, Pop Culture to Defend School Ten Commandments Mandate
Suggested options pair the Ten Commandments with Charlton Heston, Martin Luther King Jr., and Regina George of "Mean Girls."
6 min read
Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill, right, speaks alongside Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry during a press conference regarding the Ten Commandments in schools Monday, Aug. 5, 2024, in Baton Rouge, La. Murrill announced on Monday that she is filing a brief in federal court asking a judge to dismiss a lawsuit seeking to overturn the state’s new law requiring that the Ten Commandments be displayed in every public school classroom.
Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill, right, speaks alongside Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry during an Aug. 5, 2024, press conference in Baton Rouge, La., on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools. Murrill is seeking to dismiss a lawsuit aiming to overturn the state’s law requiring that they be posted in every classroom.
Hilary Scheinuk/The Advocate via AP
Law & Courts Biden's Title IX Rule Takes Effect Amid a Confusing Legal Landscape
The rule that expands protections for LGBTQ+ students is effective Aug. 1, but injunctions currently block it in 26 states.
7 min read
The U.S. Supreme Court is seen on Thursday, June 29, 2023, in Washington.
The Biden administration's new Title IX regulation was set to take effect Aug. 1, but only in parts of the country as court injunctions block it in 26 states and the U.S. Supreme Court weighs a request to step into the debate.
AP
Law & Courts A District's Rule Against Misgendering Students Is Likely Constitutional
A federal appeals court did not block a policy barring students from using pronouns that don't align with a classmate's gender identity.
4 min read
Demonstrators advocating for transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse, Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus, Ohio. A federal appeals court on Wednesday, July 17, refused to lift a judge's order temporarily blocking the Biden administration’s new Title IX rule meant to expand protections for LGBTQ+ students
Supporters of transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse on Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus, Ohio. A federal appeals court has refused to block an Ohio school district's policy that bars students from intentionally misgendering classmates by using pronouns that don't align with students' gender identity.
Patrick Orsagos/AP