Education Funding

Project 2025 Would Dramatically Cut Federal Funds for Schools. Then What?

By Mark Lieberman — July 22, 2024 9 min read
Kristen Eichamer holds a Project 2025 fan in the group's tent at the Iowa State Fair, Aug. 14, 2023, in Des Moines, Iowa. A constellation of conservative organizations is preparing for a possible second White House term for Donald Trump. The Project 2025 effort is being led by the Heritage Foundation think tank.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

If enacted, Project 2025, the conservative policy agenda that has become a centerpiece of discourse around the upcoming presidential election, could jeopardize access to an adequate education for millions of low-income students and students with disabilities through the significant funding cuts and overhauls it proposes, experts say.

The 922-page document offers what its authors from the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, call a “vision for a conservative administration” in its first 180 days. The detailed plan includes proposals to phase out the $16 billion Title I funding program over the next 10 years, convert the $13 billion IDEA program for students with disabilities to block grants or a private school choice offering, and eliminate the U.S. Department of Education.

Former President Donald Trump, the GOP presidential nominee, said on social media last month that he has “no idea who’s behind” Project 2025 and finds some of its proposals “absolutely ridiculous and abysmal.” But a CNN review found more than 200 people associated with both Project 2025 and the first Trump administration, including six cabinet secretaries who helped write or collaborate on portions of the playbook.

See Also

Kevin Roberts, president of The Heritage Foundation, speaks before Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump at the National Religious Broadcasters convention at the Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center on Feb. 22, 2024, in Nashville, Tenn.
Kevin Roberts, president of The Heritage Foundation, speaks before Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump at the National Religious Broadcasters convention at the Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center on Feb. 22, 2024, in Nashville, Tenn. Democrats are using the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 agenda to show what could happen in a Trump presidency while the former president distances himself from it.
George Walker IV/AP
Federal Project 2025: What It Is and What It Means for K-12 If Trump Wins
Libby Stanford, July 8, 2024
4 min read

The sections of the document that cover K-12 schools focus primarily on reducing the federal government’s role in education policy, often with a stated goal of shrinking federal and state bureaucracies and cutting regulatory red tape associated with federal education programs.

While school funding is among the topics covered in the report, Lindsey Burke, the Heritage Foundation’s education policy director, told Education Week earlier this year that a new conservative administration should immediately prioritize rewriting Title IX rules and reversing efforts to cancel student debt.

School districts receive about 10 percent of their funds from the government, with state and local sources supplying the lion’s share, so the proposals are necessarily limited in their reach. Still, the project would dramatically alter the federal footprint in education that began with the creation of Title I in 1965.

The exact consequences of these proposals are difficult for researchers to game out because they would reverse decades of precedent and create new opportunities for states and school districts to decide how to allocate resources. For instance, if Title I ends, some states might create their own programs to supply schools with extra resources for vulnerable students, while others might not.

Some of these proposals could be politically unpalatable in rural areas where public schools are the only option for families and private schools are limited, or in high-poverty areas—both urban and rural—where schools rely on federal funds to pay for crucial services.

But Project 2025 could nevertheless take shape in the coming years. A second Trump administration may be emboldened by recent Supreme Court decisions to seize greater executive power to advance its agenda, said Dan Goldhaber, director of the Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research, or CALDER, at the American Institutes for Research.

At a minimum, ideas like shifting U.S. Department of Education functions, like IDEA, to the existing U.S. Department of Health and Human Services are likely to cause some chaos.

“Any time that you’re talking about a relatively complex system that the machine has been running for a long time, a big change is likely to bring about at the very least short-term dysfunction,” Goldhaber said.

Here’s why researchers are concerned about the possible effects of Project 2025 on school funding.

The agenda makes a key mistake about Title I, a researcher says

Project 2025, on page 350, says Title I “provides additional taxpayer resources to schools or groups of schools in lower-income areas.”

But that’s not quite right, says Nora Gordon, an economist and professor at Georgetown University who has extensively researched federal funding for education.

Rather, Title I supplies the vast majority of the nation’s 13,000 public school districts with money to spend on their highest-poverty individual schools.

“Almost everyone’s got skin in the game,” Gordon said.

Even as Democrats in Congress and the Biden administration in recent years have pushed to dramatically increase the annual investment in Title I, the program has its fair share of critics from across the political spectrum.

Researchers have pointed out major formula flaws that end up directing less money to the neediest states and districts. For instance, large cities and remote rural areas tend to get the most money through the formula, which can leave out some poor districts that don’t fall into either category.

And critics argue that the design of the program sometimes creates incentives for districts to spend the money on initiatives with only a tangential connection to core classroom instruction.

There’s no inherent reason Title I has to be the main federal mechanism for offering money to schools, Gordon said.

“It could be some other thing,” she said. “But I don’t think that’s in [Project 2025].”

The federal government would no longer smooth disparities between states

Enacted in 1965 as part of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, Title I was crafted in part to help discourage massive gaps in school funding from one state to the next. The broader ESEA law was one plank of President Lyndon B. Johnson’s War on Poverty.

Some states have a bigger tax base than others, which means they have a larger pool of resources to devote to K-12 education. Schools in states like New York, Pennsylvania, and Wyoming get more than $20,000 per student from state and local sources, while schools in Arizona, Idaho, and Utah get just over $10,000 per student.

See Also

Tight crop of a dollar bill puzzle missing one piece
iStock/Getty

Currently, that’s where the federal government comes in with efforts to shrink those gaps.

“If you were to say, we’re turning this into something that is funded with state revenue, you’re missing a huge contribution to the program,” Gordon said.

Burke, the author of the education section of the Project 2025 playbook, argues that a new approach to funding is necessary given that academic outcomes haven’t significantly improved since Title I was enacted more than half a century ago.

“Federal money is inevitably accompanied by rules and regulations that keep the influx of funds from having much, if any, impact on student outcomes,” the report reads. “It raises the cost of education without raising student achievement.”

The idea of scaling back the federal role in funding schools is particularly galling in light of recent research showing that the increased federal investment in schools with ESSER funds led to measurable improvements in student outcomes, said Augustus Mays, vice president for partnerships and engagement at EdTrust, a nonprofit advocacy group.

“Historically, when we left it to states, they didn’t always do the right thing,” Mays said.

Key mechanisms for accountability would disappear

Schools are only eligible for Title I money if they participate in test-based accountability systems that contribute to a nationwide picture of students’ academic progress.

Some states would likely pull back on those efforts if they no longer had to do them in order for schools to receive federal funding. Project 2025 also recommends giving states the latitude to opt out of any federal education program and direct that funding according to their own priorities, citing a desire to “reduce the bureaucratic and compliance burden” associated with those programs.

“They don’t do things if they don’t have a carrot,” Gordon said. “Title I has been the big carrot.”

Meanwhile, another Project 2025 proposal for revamping education funding raises accountability questions.

Currently, the federal government sends IDEA funds to states, which in turn reimburse school districts for the often-steep costs of special education services for students with disabilities. The Heritage Foundation is proposing that those funds instead go directly to districts, or to parents, who can choose to invest them in providers of their choice, as some already do with state-funded ESAs.

If that were to happen, governments and the public would no longer have a clear sense of whether students with disabilities are receiving the legally mandated “free and appropriate public education” to which federal law entitles them, Gordon and Goldhaber said. Private school and homeschool providers range widely in quality and rigor, and states already struggle to collect data and maintain consistent standards in those arenas.

The future is unknown, but political conditions appear to be evolving

Studies by Gordon and others have shown that the early years of Title I resulted in an overall increase in spending on schools, rather than simply a shift in spending from local and state governments to the federal government.

A logical assumption, then, would be that overall spending on schools, particularly for students with high needs, could decrease if Title I went away.

But “there’s no empirical evidence we could draw on to say what would happen if the federal government no longer had the requirement and no longer provided the money,” Goldhaber said.

Similarly, there’s no way to know for sure that Project 2025 would charge ahead unencumbered if Republicans took the White House and both chambers of Congress.

Republican control of the legislative and executive branches in states doesn’t always mean conservative priorities like private school choice have made headway, as with the recent legislative debate over education savings accounts in Tennessee. Congress didn’t make changes to federal education funding during the first Trump administration, even when Republicans held majorities in Congress.

Even in the most conservative congressional districts, cutting money for public schools has historically been unpopular, Marguerite Roza, director of the Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University, said during a recent session at the Education Commission for the States conference in Washington. For that reason, she thinks major changes to federal funding for schools aren’t likely regardless of who’s in power.

But reporting in various outlets indicates that Trump’s team is coming into a potential second administration more prepared to advance its agenda and weed out dissenting voices from the federal bureaucracy.

Plus, the Supreme Court has in recent months strengthened the powers of the executive branch with several decisions, including one that extends immunity from prosecution to presidents acting in an “official” capacity.

Even the existence of a comprehensive policy document like Project 2025 suggests a sharper focus this time around, Goldhaber said.

“Before the first Trump term, I would have thought probably it’s unlikely that we would see radical change in the way that the federal government chose to involve itself with public education,” he said. “I think several things have changed since then that make the prospects for enacting more radical reforms significantly greater.”

2024 Election Coverage From EdWeek

K-12 in a 2nd Trump Term: Project 2025, a detailed policy agenda assembled by allies of the former president, outlines plans to dramatically scale back the federal role in education. Here’s how.
Kamala Harris’ Education Record: The vice president has touched education policy since her days as a prosecutor. What she’s said and done on K-12.
The GOP’s 2024 Education Platform: We break down the party’s nine key education positions in its official platform. Here’s what the party has in mind.
‘God Knows We Don’t Pay You Enough': Kamala Harris rallied teachers in one of her first campaign speeches. Here’s what she said.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Science Webinar
Spark Minds, Reignite Students & Teachers: STEM’s Role in Supporting Presence and Engagement
Is your district struggling with chronic absenteeism? Discover how STEM can reignite students' and teachers' passion for learning.
Content provided by Project Lead The Way
Recruitment & Retention Webinar EdRecruiter 2025 Survey Results: The Outlook for Recruitment and Retention
See exclusive findings from EdWeek’s nationwide survey of K-12 job seekers and district HR professionals on recruitment, retention, and job satisfaction. 
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Funding Rural Schools Are Set to Lose Key Federal Funds—Unless Congress Acts Fast
Thousands of districts near national forest land could lose money as the Secure Rural Schools Act expires.
7 min read
Image of a student about to board a school bus in the morning.
iStock/Getty
Education Funding Public Schools by the Numbers: How Enrollment, Funding, and More Changed in 2024
K-12 enrollment is dropping, funding is lagging economic growth, and other takeaways from newly available data.
4 min read
An illustration of a man standing on top of a large division symbol. There are a couple of coins on each of the circular parts of the division symbol and the man is holding a briefcase in one hand and looking through a magnifying glass with the other hand.
DigitalVision Vectors
Education Funding Will Trump Cut Climate Funds for Schools? Here's What Could Happen
Tax credits for energy-efficient HVAC systems and electric school buses could go away once Republicans take control of Congress.
8 min read
A close up photograph of an electric school bus charging at a charging station.
iStock/Getty
Education Funding Trump's Plans Would Disrupt Funding for Schools. What Would It Look Like?
School districts are bracing for a period of fiscal turbulence and whiplash that could strain their efforts to meet students’ complex needs.
12 min read
Image of a student desk sitting on top of a pile of books
Collage via iStock/Getty