Law & Courts

State Courts Side With Charters

By Erik W. Robelen — December 12, 2006 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Charter school advocates in Colorado and Ohio recently got some welcome legal news.

A Denver judge has upheld the constitutionality of a statewide body that authorizes the independent but publicly funded schools in Colorado.

In Ohio, plaintiffs who challenged the state’s charter school program said they will end their lawsuit. The Ohio Supreme Court, in striking down key elements of the suit by a vote of 4-3 in October, said the charter program is constitutional.

Three school districts in Colorado filed lawsuits contending that the Colorado Charter School Institute usurps local districts’ authority to open and oversee schools. A 2004 law created the institute. Most Colorado districts have been granted exclusive authority to approve charters within their boundaries, but the three districts that filed lawsuits had been denied that authority. (Since then, one has gained the authority.)

“It was a very strong ruling in our favor,” Randy DeHoff, who heads the charter institute, said of the Dec. 2 decision. Seven institute-approved charters are now in operation.

Jana L. Ley, the board president for Colorado’s 23,000-student Poudre district, a plaintiff, noted that the judge did not rule on the districts’ challenges to the state’s rejection of their applications to become exclusive chartering bodies. No decision has been made on whether to appeal, Ms. Ley said.

In Ohio, a coalition of teachers’ unions and other groups issued a joint statement Dec. 5 announcing their plans to abandon legal action.

“[N]ew opportunities for legislative reforms and new elected officials who are committed to charter school accountability offer more hope for positive change in the near term,” said Mark Hatch, the public-policy director for the Ohio Association of Public School Employees.

The Ohio high court did not rule on certain nonconstitutional questions. For one, the plaintiffs contend that some schools are operating in violation of state law.

Chad A. Readler, a lawyer for about 100 charter schools in the case, said: “The Ohio Supreme Court made clear that these education policy issues are best left to be decided by the legislature, where all voices can be heard.”

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the December 13, 2006 edition of Education Week

Events

Artificial Intelligence K-12 Essentials Forum Big AI Questions for Schools. How They Should Respond 
Join this free virtual event to unpack some of the big questions around the use of AI in K-12 education.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Harnessing AI to Address Chronic Absenteeism in Schools
Learn how AI can help your district improve student attendance and boost academic outcomes.
Content provided by Panorama Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Science Webinar
Spark Minds, Reignite Students & Teachers: STEM’s Role in Supporting Presence and Engagement
Is your district struggling with chronic absenteeism? Discover how STEM can reignite students' and teachers' passion for learning.
Content provided by Project Lead The Way

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Supreme Court Won't Take Up Case on District's Gender Transition Policy
The U.S. Supreme Court declined an appeal from a parents' group contending that a district's policy on gender support plans excludes them.
4 min read
The Supreme Court is pictured, June 30, 2024, in Washington.
The Supreme Court is pictured, June 30, 2024, in Washington. The court on Monday declined to hear a case about a school district’s policy to support students undergoing gender transitions.
Susan Walsh/AP
Law & Courts High Court Won't Review School Admissions Policy That Sought to Boost Diversity
The U.S. Supreme Court refused a case about whether race was unconstitutionally considered in admissions to Boston's selective schools.
5 min read
The Supreme Court is pictured, Oct. 7, 2024, in Washington.
The Supreme Court is pictured, Oct. 7, 2024, in Washington. The court on Monday declined to take up a case about the Boston district’s facially race-neutral admissions policy for selective magnet high schools.
Mariam Zuhaib/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Case on Medical Care for Trans Youth Could Impact School Sports
The justices weigh a Tennessee law that bars certain medical treatments for transgender minors, with school issues bubbling around the case.
8 min read
Transgenders rights supporters rally outside of the Supreme Court, Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2024, in Washington.
Transgender rights supporters rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 4 as the court weighed a Tennessee law that restricts certain medical treatments for transgender minors.
Jose Luis Magana/AP
Law & Courts How a Supreme Court Case on Vaping Stands to Impact Schools
The U.S. Supreme Court heard an important case about federal regulation of flavored e-cigarettes, which remain a concern for schools.
6 min read
A high school principal displays vaping devices that were confiscated from students in such places as restrooms or hallways at a school in Massachusetts on April 10, 2018.
A high school principal in Massachusetts displays vaping devices that were confiscated from students in restrooms or hallways on April 10, 2018.
Steven Senne/AP