Law & Courts

Supreme Court Rules Deaf Student Can Sue School District Over Alleged Failures

By Mark Walsh — March 21, 2023 5 min read
Miguel Perez
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled unanimously that a deaf student may pursue his lawsuit for money damages against a Michigan school district that allegedly failed for years to provide him with adequate sign language assistance.

The court held in Luna Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools that a procedural requirement under the main federal special education law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, does not bar the student’s claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

The decision will allow the now-27-year-old student, Miguel Luna Perez, to pursue damages under the ADA. And it will make it easier for other students with disabilities and their families to bypass often slow-moving administrative proceedings under the IDEA when their chief claim is for damages under other federal laws such as the ADA or the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

The key question in the case was whether students and parents must “exhaust” all administrative proceedings under the IDEA before they may sue under a different federal law such as the ADA when the remedy at issue, such as money damages, is not available under the IDEA.

Writing for the court, Justice Neil M. Gorsuch suggested both sides offered a plausible view on the issue, but “we believe Mr. Perez’s better comports with the statute’s terms.”

“The statute’s administrative exhaustion requirement applies only to suits that ‘seek relief … also available under’ IDEA,” Gorsuch said, referring to a central but confusing provision Congress added to the IDEA. “And that condition simply is not met in situations like ours, where a plaintiff brings a suit under another federal law for compensatory damages—a form of relief everyone agrees IDEA does not provide.”

Gorsuch delivered a short summary of his opinion from the bench, a tradition the court restored only recently after three years of simply posting its decisions online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The opinion is eight pages and came two months after the case was argued in January.

Gorsuch said the court did not decide two other issues advanced in briefs and arguments. One of those, argued by Luna Perez’s lawyers, was that the IDEA’s administrative exhaustion requirement is susceptible to a “futility exception,” meaning the requirement categorically would not apply when exhaustion would be futile, as in Luna Perez’s case. The other, raised by lawyers for the school district, was that money damages are not even available under the ADA, so Luna Perez will ultimately not get the unspecified money damages he is seeking.

“But today, we have no occasion to address any of those things,” Gorsuch said. “In proceedings below, the courts held that [the IDEA’s exhaustion provision] precluded Mr. Perez’s ADA lawsuit. We clarify that nothing in that provision bars his way.”

Brian Wolfman, a law professor at Georgetown University Law Center, and the director of an appellate clinic that had filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of Luna Perez, said the decision was “a very good outcome for kids.”

“If someone is seeking monetary relief in statutes other than the IDEA, the decision today says you can go straight to court,” he said. “Parents and students don’t have to get caught up in this IDEA exhaustion process, where they can get deterred.”

Pursuing ADA suit after a settlement of IDEA claims

Roman Martinez, the Washington lawyer who argued the case for Luna Perez, said in a written statement that “the court’s ruling vindicates the rights of students with disabilities to obtain full relief when they suffer discrimination. Miguel and his family look forward to pursuing their legal claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act.”

Art Ebert, the superintendent of Sturgis Public Schools, said in an interview that because he had joined the district after it had settled with Luna Perez’s over the student’s IDEA claims in 2018, he could not comment on the details or outcome of the case.

“Having said that, I can share that I believe that every experience provides us with an opportunity to learn and grow,” Ebert said. “Through this, too, we will gain knowledge, insight, and understanding that will help us maximize every student’s true potential.”

Ebert said it was too early to say whether the district would continue to vigorously defend itself against Luna Perez’s ADA suit.

Gorsuch provided a short but poignant factual backdrop of the case involving Luna Perez, who immigrated from Mexico with his parents and attended Sturgis public schools from age 9 to 20.

“Because Mr. Perez is deaf, Sturgis provided him with aides to translate classroom instruction into sign language,” Gorsuch wrote. “For years, Mr. Perez and his parents allege, Sturgis assigned aides who were either unqualified (including one who attempted to teach herself sign language) or absent from the classroom for hours on end.”

“Along the way,” Gorsuch continued, “Sturgis allegedly misrepresented Mr. Perez’s educational progress too, awarding him inflated grades and advancing him from grade to grade regardless of his progress. Based on Sturgis’s misrepresentations, Mr. Perez and his parents say, they believed he was on track to graduate from high school with his class. But then, months before graduation, Sturgis revealed that it would not award him a diploma.”

Although the school district and Luna Perez reached a settlement of his IDEA claim, the 3,000-student district has not conceded that it had failed to provide him a “free appropriate public education,” or FAPE, under the special education law.

Luna Perez attended the Michigan School for the Deaf for several years at the school district’s expense, finally graduating with a high school diploma in 2020. He attended the oral arguments with the help of teams of Certified Hearing Interpreters using American Sign Language and Certified Deaf Interpreters.

In a statement he released through his lawyers in January, Luna Perez said he had learned construction skills at the Michigan School for the Deaf and was interested in home building as a job. He was pursuing his legal case to ensure that other deaf students are provided adequate assistance in schools.

“I want to win, and hope that others like me get interpreters,” he said.

Events

Student Achievement K-12 Essentials Forum Learning Interventions That Work
Join this free virtual event to explore best practices in academic interventions and how to know whether they are making a difference.
School & District Management Webinar Fostering Productive Relationships Between Principals and Teachers
Strong principal-teacher relationships = happier teachers & thriving schools. Join our webinar for practical strategies.
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Nation's Largest Teachers' Union Sues Education Department Over DEI Threats
It's the second lawsuit to challenge the guidance that seeks to end diversity, equity, and inclusion in schools.
4 min read
Education Secretary Linda McMahon, left, greets Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., before President Donald Trump addresses a joint session of Congress at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, March 4, 2025.
Education Secretary Linda McMahon, left, greets Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., before President Donald Trump addresses a joint session of Congress at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, March 4, 2025. The National Education Association and ACLU are suing the U.S. Department of Education over its letter seeking to end race-based programming in schools.
Ben Curtis/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Won't Take Up Case on Schools' Bias-Response Policies
Over the dissents of two justices, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to weigh a case about educational institutions' bias-reporting policies.
3 min read
Students walk to class on the Indiana University campus, Oct. 14, 2021, in Bloomington, Ind.
The U.S. Supreme Court on March 3 declined to take up a challenge to the bias-response policy of Indiana University, including at its Bloomington campus shown above.
Darron Cummings/AP
Law & Courts Schools May Get Relief From Overcharges After Supreme Court Ruling on E-Rate
The ruling potentially bolsters schools that have been overcharged by telecommunications companies.
5 min read
The Supreme Court building is seen on June 13, 2024, in Washington.
The U.S. Supreme Court, seen here on June 13, 2024, on Feb. 21 issued a ruling that means private whistleblowers may pursue lawsuits alleging fraud under the federal E-rate program that provides internet connections to schools.
Mark Schiefelbein/AP
Law & Courts Parents Lose Appeal Over School’s Gender Identity Notification Policy
A federal appeals court ruled for a district in the case of a 9th grader who did not want officials to notify parents of gender transition.
6 min read
A person holds up LGTBQ+ pride flags during the Pride Parade in New York, June 24, 2018.
LGTBQ+ pride flags during the Pride Parade in New York City in 2018. A federal appeals court has rejected a parental rights claim against a Massachusetts district's policy of supporting students' gender transitions.
Steve Luciano/AP