Opinion
College & Workforce Readiness Letter to the Editor

Commentary Misleading on NAEP, Dropouts

October 23, 2012 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

The recent Commentary “Public Schools: Glass Half Full or Half Empty?” (Oct. 10, 2012), provides a problematic view of education progress that can easily backfire.

The authors fail to show and discuss the statistically flat performance in both reading and mathematics in the long-term-trend National Asssessment of Educational Progress for students at age 17, and use a clever graphic to hide nearly flat reading performance for students ages 9 and 13.

The real message of the long-term-trend NAEP is that the gains made in lower grades do not survive until high school graduation. This serious problem worries many.

The authors’ high school dropout claims are also problematic. Many researchers of high school completion distrust dropout-rate figures. This was one of the reasons why Congress elected to use high school graduation rates in the No Child Left Behind Act.

In addition, the specific dropout data selected by the authors—the National Center for Education Statistics’ “status dropout rate"—treats dropouts who later receive a General Educational Development credential as high school successes. Inclusion of GED recipients with regular high school diploma graduates further muddies the water as far as assessing the real performance of school systems. At present, the most reliable measure of high school completion is the Averaged Freshman Graduation Rate, or AFGR.

Table 111 in the 2011 edition of the Digest of Education Statistics shows the U.S. public school AFGR in 1969-1970 was 78.7 percent. In 2008-09, it was only 75.5 percent. Even the projected rate for 2009-10 is only 76.3 percent.

Thus, the best available information on high school completion since 1970 shows that graduation rates actually are lower recently than in the early 1970s.

None of this factual information does much to boost public confidence in schools, of course. And, educators citing problematic commentaries to try to claim otherwise won’t boost that confidence level, either.

Richard Innes

Staff Education Analyst

Bluegrass Institute for Public Policy Solutions

Bowling Green, Ky.

Related Tags:
Dropouts NAEP Opinion

A version of this article appeared in the October 24, 2012 edition of Education Week as Commentary Misleading on NAEP, Dropouts

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Webinar
Reflections on Evidence-Based Grading Practices: What We Learned for Next Year
Get real insights on evidence-based grading from K-12 leaders.
Content provided by Otus
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Creating Resilient Schools with a Trauma-Responsive MTSS
Join us to learn how school leaders are building a trauma-responsive MTSS to support students & improve school outcomes.
School & District Management Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: We Can’t Engage Students If They Aren’t Here: Strategies to Address the Absenteeism Conundrum
Absenteeism rates are growing fast. Join Peter DeWitt and experts to learn how to re-engage students & families.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

College & Workforce Readiness Spotlight Spotlight on CTE and Beyond: Expanding Opportunities for Students
This Spotlight will help you explore innovative approaches to CTE, real-world learning experiences, and more.
College & Workforce Readiness Q&A College Board's CEO on How AP Courses Are Changing for the AI Era
College Board CEO David Coleman on AP’s shift toward career readiness, AI’s impact, and new courses in cybersecurity and business.
7 min read
College Board President David Coleman attends an announcement event on March 5, 2014, in Austin, where College Board officials announced updates for the SAT college entrance exam.
College Board President David Coleman spoke with Education Week last month about the organization's move to design AP courses with input from the business community.
Eric Gay/AP
College & Workforce Readiness Not Your Parents' CTE: How Career and Technical Education Is Evolving
School districts are redefining CTE to expose students to a broad range of potential careers.
5 min read
Hard hat on a stack of books, next to a wrench and screwdriver.
iStock/Getty
College & Workforce Readiness These AP Classes Were Designed to Attract Students of Color. Did They?
New data show two new Advanced Placement courses helped boost participation among Black and Latino students.
3 min read
Data shown on a computer screen.
iStock/Getty