Special Education

U.S., California Tussle Over Test Modifications

By Christina A. Samuels — December 13, 2005 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The Department of Education has told California that if students with disabilities use certain modifications on state tests, such as calculators on mathematics assessments, those students cannot be counted as participating in the test for the purposes of calculating adequate yearly progress under the No Child Left Behind Act.

The issue arose during an on-site review of the state’s assessment procedures, said William L. Padia, the director of policy and evaluation for the California Department of Education.

The state had allowed students with disabilities to use assistive devices like calculators on the tests required under the federal education law, and to be counted as having taken the test, said Mr. Padia. Students who used assistive devices would be graded as “below proficient,” he said.

During the September site visit, Education Department representatives said that California could not continue to count those students as having taken the test, Mr. Padia said.

See Also

Chad Colby, a spokesman for the federal department, referred to August nonregulatory guidance on the topic of alternate assessments for children with disabilities.

The guidance indicates that certain accommodations can be used as long as they do not “invalidate” the test.

But, “if a student uses an accommodation that results in an invalid score, the student is considered to be a nonparticipant when calculating the participation rate for AYP purposes,” the guidance reads.

‘Appropriate Modifications’

Mr. Padia said he understands that students who use assistive devices shouldn’t have their scores be considered proficient. “But, they did take the test,” he said. “We just allowed them to have appropriate modifications.”

He did not know how many students might use such modifications, which could include calculators on math tests, dictated test questions, or the use of a dictionary. The decisions are made at the school level, he said.

But the change, which is effective for this school year’s tests, could result in some schools not making adequate yearly progress because their participation rates will change, he said. The No Child Left Behind law requires that 95 percent of a school’s population take the state assessments for a school to make AYP.

Mr. Padia said the department is brainstorming on potential solutions, “but there’s no guarantee any of them can be acceptable.”

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Attend to the Whole Child: Non-Academic Factors within MTSS
Learn strategies for proactively identifying and addressing non-academic barriers to student success within an MTSS framework.
Content provided by Renaissance
Classroom Technology K-12 Essentials Forum How to Teach Digital & Media Literacy in the Age of AI
Join this free event to dig into crucial questions about how to help students build a foundation of digital literacy.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Special Education Can AI Help With Special Ed.? There's Promise—and Reason to Be Cautious
Some special education professionals are experimenting with the technology.
3 min read
Photo collage of woman using tablet computer and AI icon.
iStock / Getty Images Plus
Special Education Many Students Can Get Special Ed. Until Age 22. What Districts Should Do
School districts' responsibilities under federal special education law aren't always clear-cut.
4 min read
Instructor working with adult special needs student.
iStock
Special Education How a Mindset Shift Can Help Solve Special Education Misidentification
Many educators face the problem of misidentification of special education students. Here are strategies educators are using to fix it.
3 min read
Timothy Allison, a collaborative special education teacher in Birmingham, Ala., works with a student at Sun Valley Elementary School on Sept. 8, 2022.
Timothy Allison, a collaborative special education teacher in Birmingham, Ala., works with a student at Sun Valley Elementary School on Sept. 8, 2022.
Jay Reeves/AP
Special Education Impact of Missed Special Ed. Evaluations Could Echo for Years
The onset of COVID-19 slowed special education identification. Four years later, a new study hints at the massive scale of the impact.
6 min read
Blank puzzle pieces in a bunch with a person icon tile standing alone to the side.
Liz Yap/Education Week with iStock/Getty